Top Stability Shoes for Runners in 2025

Published: 12 minutes ago

Jonathan Beverly

(Photo: 101 Degrees West)

At a Glance

The New Era of Stability
Key Features to Seek in a Stability Shoe
Beyond the Shoe
What Shoes We Included
How We Tested
Best All-Around: Asics Kayano 31 ($165)
Runner-up Best All-Around: Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 ($164)
Best Plush Stability: PumaForeverRUN Nitro 2 ($150)
Runner-up Best Plush: Diadora Nucleo 2 ($160)
Best Firm, Responsive Support: Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 ($140)
Runner-up Best Firm Support: Topo UltraFly 5 ($140)
Most Invisible Support: Altra Experience Form ($145)
Best Full-Foot Support: New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 ($140)
Best for Racing: Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 ($140)
Best for Up-Tempo Days: Saucony Tempus 2 ($160)
Best for Going Long: Coast to Mountain P1 ($160)
Best for Recovery Days: Hoka Gaviota 5 ($175)

The New Era of Balance Footwear

Determining what classifies as a stability running shoe has become more complex, which is actually beneficial. In the past, identifying such shoes was straightforward; they were characterized by their firm, dark-colored foam under the inner part of the midsole known as the medial post, intended to prevent overpronation—the excessive inward roll of the ankle during motion. During runs, these shoes stood out due to their rigid, weighty feel and emphasis on control. However, this is no longer the case.

Modern stability shoes are highly cushioned, providing a seamless ride without bulky control mechanisms. As such, they offer similar comfort levels to both neutral runners and those requiring additional support. Instead of rigid medial posts, manufacturers now employ various subtle, better-integrated techniques to assist runners with excessive foot pronation or supination.

It's high time, considering that the science It has been demonstrated since the 1990s that too muchpronation seldom causes issues, and conventional motion-control approaches have minimal impact on reducing this excess movement. However, transformation within the industry and among people long accustomed to these practices has progressed gradually. pronation paradigm Although the demand for stability shoes has diminished significantly over the last ten years, along with a reduction in the variety of such models available, recent changes have just begun to influence the design and feel of these footwear options.

Stability depends on numerous factors including the design of the sole, the thickness of the cushioning layer, the firmness of the midsole, the durability of the outer sole, along with the type and construction of the upper material—not only medial posting," explains Kurt Stockbridge, who serves as the vice president of product development at Skechers. "All these elements can be adjusted individually to create excellent stability shoes without them conforming to our usual expectations.

The latest stability shoe designs acknowledge that each component of the footwear influences how you run. These innovations aim to minimize the instability created by the shoe’s design, which can separate your feet further from the ground. Interestingly, numerous neutral shoes—those typically not categorized or promoted as stability options—are now incorporating sturdier bases to counteract the unsteadiness associated with higher, softer midsole cushions.

Key Features to Seek in a Stability Shoe

When recommending stability shoes to his patients, Paul Langer, a sports podiatrist at Twin Cities Orthopedics and former president of the American Association of Podiatric Sports Medicine, advises looking for one with a straight last design. This type of construction ensures that the arch area is well-supported, allowing for a continuous straight line along the outer part of the sole from the heel through to the forefoot. "In an extremely straight-last shoe," explains Langer, "you wouldn't be able to distinguish whether it was meant for your left or right foot." He adds that conventional footwear typically has some curvature; however, the lesser this curve, the greater the shoe’s overall stability.

Langer views this expansive base as more crucial for stability compared to the thicker medial support, which has traditionally determined stability classification. "When discussing stability," he explains, "I'm likely focusing more on the design of the shoe rather than the supportive aspects."

This applies equally to other stabilizing elements such as guide rails, frames, plates, or heel counters. "I worry less about these components," states Langer, citing studies indicating that such devices do not manage or rectify excessive pronation. Nonetheless, he does not disregard stabilization techniques, noting they may reduce some instability resulting from compression into softer foam materials. "Stabilized footwear does not fix issues," stresses Langer. "It simply could be slightly more stable compared to a regular shoe."

Langer also mentions, "I make an effort to assist my patients in grasping that a cushioned shoe is essentially less steady compared to walking barefoot." When you land, which exerts two to three times your body weight onto a substantial layer of soft foam, this naturally leads to uneven compression of the foam and amplifies any irregularities. Hence, despite numerous shoes now being crafted with straighter, fuller forms, one must take into account both the thickness and firmness of the foam used.

Identifying the right mix of cushioning, design, and support characteristics that suits your needs requires testing several styles and figuring out which one fits best. provides optimal comfort for your foot and step . This “ comfort filter , serves as our best starting point according to Langer. This involves evaluating which shoe offers the most natural alignment.

Emily Stefanski, a sports podiatrist at Coastline Foot and Ankle serving Connecticut and Rhode Island, who was once a Division 1 college long-distance runner before becoming a marathon competitor, agrees with this sentiment. She explains, "My advice to patients is to choose based on comfort for their feet." She adds, "While I do follow certain guidelines and believe some options will be more effective, these aren’t always accurate because numerous variables come into play."

Past the Sole: Diversity and Resilience

Remember that even when you find a shoe that enhances your walking style, should not be your sole pair of shoes . A handful of studies Demonstrate that runners experience fewer injuries when they cycle between various pairs of shoes. "The key isn’t necessarily discovering the ideal shoe, but rather recognizing that your feet must remain robust and flexible by varying your footwear choices," explains Langer. This allows your feet to encounter differing levels of stress and strain. Thus, opt for a stability shoe that suits you well as your primary training companion; additionally, keep a minimalist option handy—perhaps solely for light activities like walking or gardening—and occasionally take runs with it. low, flexible trainer as well as a soft, rocker-shaped one.

Stefanski additionally remarks, "I consistently aim to emphasize a significant amount of strength training." Coaches, physical therapists, biomechanists, and podiatrists concur that excessive pronation and various stability problems typically arise due to strength and mobility problems , and this issue can typically be resolved by enhancing your technique across the entire sequence from your feet to your hips. Stafanski remarks, "I think we have the potential to enhance our performance over time, and most individuals don’t necessarily require continuous support from their footwear; they could transition away from stability shoes. The key factor is how dedicated someone is to performing these exercises."

What Shoes We Included

Considering the flexible interpretation of what constitutes a stable shoe, the parameters for selecting "stability shoes" inherently involve some subjectivity. We decided to feature only those models equipped with specific structures or designs intended to guide the foot’s movement during motion.

We did not include plated shoes in this guide, although some runners find that the curved plates in super shoes and super trainers provide sufficient stability for their strides. Stefanski says, “I have noticed with my hyper-flexible people, putting them into a carbon plated shoe, they’re perfect. They don’t need anything else.” Others, however, find plated shoes exacerbate their instability (and each super shoe performs differently ).

Think of this as a lineup of footwear crafted particularly for individuals requiring assistance in preventing excessive inward rotation of their feet; however, understand that it isn’t all-encompassing or definitive. There might be alternative styles featuring broad soles and midsole designs engineered to minimize sideways pressure and encourage smoother movement from heel-strike to push-off, which could offer similar stability suited just as well for your needs.

The Methodology Behind Our Testing of Stability Shoes

After running in dozens of new shoe models this year, I sorted out those with stability features and completed multiple runs in each of them at a variety of distances and paces. Most models were also run in by more than 20 wear-testers who help select and inform the reviews in our best running shoe round-ups.

Here’s my background: I have been involved in running since the late '70s and have worked as both an editor and shoe reviewer for running magazines starting from 2000. Additionally, I am the writer of several publications. Your Best Stride , and Run Strong, Stay Hungry Once upon a time, I was a consistent runner who clocked in at around 2 hours and 46 minutes for marathons with weekly mileage often exceeding 50 miles. However, due to persistent injuries and advancing years, both my running speed during easier sessions and overall distance covered have dropped significantly. These injuries have led to complex needs when it comes to shoe stability. Specifically, my left foot features a high arch and requires minimal intervention, whereas my right foot has suffered from various strains over time and benefits more from additional support. Yet, excessive lateral support causes discomfort in my right knee because this area tends to pronate inward to alleviate strain caused by an ongoing issue. Given all these factors, testing out newer approaches to stability footwear—which claim to adjust according to individual support levels—seems like quite fitting groundwork for someone like myself.

Best Stability Shoes 2025

Best All-Around

Asics GEL-Kayano 31

$165 at Amazon (Men’s) $165 at Amazon (Women’s)

Weight: 10.8 ounces (for men), 9.5 ounces (for women)

Stack Height: 40-30 mm for men; 39-29 mm for women

Drop: 10 mm

Stability Strategy: Plush, highly responsive inner post. Broad, outward-sloping foundation. Carved midsole.

The 30th-anniversary edition of the Kayano last year showcased one of the most significant shifts in stability technology within the footwear industry. Over thirty years, the Kayano series maintained runners' alignment through robust medial posts and rigid midfoot bridges. However, for the Kayano 30—and continuing into the Kayano 31—these strong control elements were substituted with innovative geometric designs and subtle guidance mechanisms aimed at steering the foot more naturally without drawing attention to themselves as overtly corrective features.

The platform boasts an expansive design extending from the heel to the toes, with additional width underneath the ball of the foot. On the outer part of the heel, the structure is carved away to allow for greater compression, which helps smooth and decelerate the shift from initial heel strike to mid-stance. Conversely, a protrusion on the inner side limits compression, complemented by the midsole wrapping around the backside of the heel to offer containment and gentle support.

The most distinctive feature is a segment of softer, low-density yet very reactive foam located beneath the arch where earlier models featured a rigid medial support. According to ASICS, this softer section can compress upon loading, thereby expanding the effective width of the midfoot area. Additionally, due to its high rebound properties compared to the primary material, it aids in guiding your foot back into an optimal position during the transition from mid-stance phase.

This new insert is based on research indicating that it isn’t the level of pronation which makes runners prone to injuries but rather something else. duration of time at maximum foot pronation Therefore, rather than attempting to prevent the foot from rotating, the shoe swiftly guides it back to a centered position.

While on the move, I missed noticing the bounce beneath the arch until my foot transitioned smoothly to the forefoot, giving me an upright and balanced stance, prepared for a solid takeoff. Primarily, what stood out was the shoe's spacious design—it offered ample room without being overly loose—which provided confidence during each step and roll-over motion. Even with the substantial 40mm heel-to-toe drop, I never sensed instability; instead, the harmonious blend of softness and quick response along with the unexpectedly pliable front part contributed significantly. Although the pace wasn't exceptionally brisk, the stride remained fluid and lacked stiffness typical of controlling shoes. Both my unevenly shaped feet experienced comfort and support throughout, which became more noticeable and appreciated during extended runs where fatigue set in.

The updated, engineered mesh upper of the 31 enhanced the smooth ride and provided comfortable support with just the right amount of cushioning—neither too much nor too little. Additionally, Asics decreased the lateral heel flare present in the Kayano 30, which previously caused unintended rotational force upon landing. This change resulted in a gentler slope that smoothly guided the foot to the ground, even during heavy heel strikes.

Overall, the Kayano 31 is a footwear option suitable for almost any runner, offering comfort and support that remains unobtrusive while seemingly reducing tiredness.

Runner-up Best All-Around

Brooks Glycerin GTS 22

$165 at REI (Men’s) $165 at REI (Women’s)

Weight: 10.7 ounces for men, 9.5 ounces for women

Stack Height: 38–28 mm (forefoot)

Drop: 10 mm

Stability Strategy: Guiding rails. Adjusted middle sole cushioning. Broad, direct form.

We awarded the Glycerin GTS 21 as "The Best Overall Stability Shoe" in last year's extensive review of running shoes due to its excellent combination of cushioning and supportive stability. For this updated model, they have retained their well-known GuideRails—which consist of elevated sections within the upper part of the midsole surrounding the back foot area with denser material on one side—but also incorporated an innovative element: specially calibrated midsole foam.

What sets apart Brooks' nitrogen-enhanced adjusted midsole, which we first noticed in Glycerin Max last autumn , which means it is softer on the outside and more firm on the inside—a slightly firmer feel in the heel and considerably firmer in the forefoot—across the same piece of foam. This new technology enables Brooks to adjust the characteristics of various segments within the foam midsole during production.

Carson Caprara, who serves as the senior vice president of footwear at Brooks, mentions that they introduce two distinct chemical formulations into the midsole mold prior to undergoing the supercritical gas-infusion technique. "When this mixture encounters the high-pressure nitrogen infusion," he elaborates, "the resulting cellular structures behave differently; the internal cells remain relatively compact and stable, whereas the external ones expand significantly, leading to increased suppleness and leniency. This entire procedure occurs seamlessly without any joints or protrusions, ensuring uniformity in feel."

Brooks adjusts the foam such that the midsole contains a greater proportion of larger cells in the heel for better shock absorption during landing. Then, this composition shifts towards predominantly smaller cells in the responsive forefoot area. This design provides a feel that is both plush upon initial contact due to the outer foam cushioning and compression, yet firm when your bodyweight moves seamlessly over into the forefoot for push-off. In testing the new version compared to the Glycerin 21, I noticed enhanced protection coupled with increased responsiveness in each stride; consequently, my runs were quicker and smoother, making time pass swiftly mile after mile.

The integration of guide rails at the back, coupled with firmer, adjusted cushioning upfront and a somewhat fuller profile beneath the arch, provided largely unobtrusive stability throughout each stride—from heel strike to pushoff. However, I noticed increased pressure from the guide rail underfoot compared to earlier iterations, particularly near the forefoot area where the denser padding underneath became more pronounced. While this offered reassuring support for my require extra assistance, it also seemed rather restrictive for individuals with naturally stable feet. Despite these factors preventing us from designating the Glycerin 22 as our top overall pick due to limited adaptability, enhanced support does make it preferable for runners seeking guided motion control.

Best Plush Stability

Puma ForeverRUN Nitro 2

$150 at Running Warehouse (For Men) $150 at The Running Warehouse (For Women)

Weight: 10.7 oz (for men); oz (for women)

Stack Height: 38–28 mm

Drop: 10 mm

Stability Strategy: Sturdier foam structure. Broad, angular design.

The nitrogen-enhanced TPE foam used by Puma provides an exceptionally smooth experience as you run, effectively softening your landing and propelling you forward with energy during takeoff. In the ForeverRUN Nitro 2 model, they utilize this foam in dual densities: a softer inner layer surrounded by a more rigid outer section designed to enhance overall stability without constraining foot movement. According to Conor Cashin, who serves as the senior product line manager at Puma, "Our focus was on the rate at which runners were experiencing pronation And we genuinely attempted to concentrate on reducing that pace while still permitting runners to pronate to some degree, as this is the body’s inherent method of providing shock absorption."

In this revised edition, the two foams are integrated using a co-molding process instead of being layered and bonded, resulting in a more seamless interaction between them. "By extending the soft nitro foam from the bottom to throughout the shoe," explains Cashin, "we achieved enhanced cushioning and responsiveness. The firmer nitro foam surrounding the foot provides the necessary stability."

The sole has been considerably broadened—especially beneath the arch in the midfoot area—to improve stability, and it’s also two millimeters thicker, which adds to the comfort underfoot. However, the real standout feature of this shoe is the engineered, circular-knit upper; it cradles your foot beautifully, offering ample padding at the heel collar, providing a smooth fit as it stretches gently over your foot, and securing the midfoot with lightweight, printed reinforcement panels.

While running, the initial impression was formed by how smoothly the shoes cushioned my steps (consistent with expectations) without disrupting my natural gait. Despite having a tall profile and being quite soft overall, they remained steady due to their broad structure and firm edges. This stability was particularly noticeable around my main toes, where it provided a sturdy platform as my foot shifted during each step. The combination of comfort for relaxed jogs and responsive rebound made them suitable not just for casual outings but also capable of handling faster-paced sessions efficiently.

Runner-up, Plush Stability

Diadora Nucleo 2

$160 at Diadora (Men’s) $160 at Diadora (Women’s)

Weight: 9.7 ounces for men; 7.4 ounces for women

Stack Height: 35–30 mm

Drop: 5 mm

Stability Strategy: Unconventional geometry. Broad, linear form. Side walls. Reactive foam.

After my run with the Nucleo 2, the initial comment noted down was "a smooth and comfortable ride with great support." This comfort comes largely from the thick foam beneath the balls and toes due to the minimal heel-to-toe offset of just 5 millimeters, which allows for gentle sinking without compromising stride. Supportiveness arises from this same foamy material offering resilient rebound once compressed during each step.

Stability is achieved through geometric design: the broad midsole foam features cut-out sections that permit greater compression, and these areas beneath the arch are reinforced to reduce softness and enhance support. The elevated walls on either side of the shoe softly embrace and align the heel area.

While running, what stood out was the soft cushioning beneath the arch that remained neither too firm nor intrusive, offering a reassuring feeling of stability. The generously padded upper and tongues with extra padding cradled my feet comfortably yet kept them firmly in place. However, my sole concern was the excessive flare at the outer edge of the heel which caused some twisting upon landing during slow runs with a forceful heel-strike.

The Nucleo 2 offers such nuanced stability guidance that someone with a neutral running style might not even pick up on it. This makes the sneaker adaptable for almost everyone except those who require significant rotational support. Whether I sought out comfort or just intended to take an easy run, these shoes were my go-to choice day after day.

Ideal for Stability, Reactive Assistance

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24

$140 at REI (Men’s) $140 at REI (Women’s)

Weight: 8.0 ounces (for women); 10.0 ounces (for men)

Stack Height: 35.5–23.5 mm

Drop: 12 mm

Stability Strategy: Guiding rails. Broad, direct foundation. Sturdy reactive midsole.

Back in 2019, Brooks revamped the Adrenaline, their iconic stability shoe, by removing the thick, full-height medial post and introducing GuideRails instead. This new feature can be seen on all their stability footwear models today. The GuideRails consist of firm strips of elevated foam located atop the midsole, extending from the heel through the center part of the arch on either side. They are firmer on the inner (arch) portion to minimize excessive inward rolling, while maintaining the same density as the rest of the midsole on the outside edge to prevent lateral slippage at the heel. Compared to traditional posts, these rails offer a lighter, softer, and more fluid form of support. Additionally, because they activate selectively based on need rather than continuously, they cater to a broader spectrum of runners.

[The GuideRail] does not extend all the way to the ground, allowing some flexibility for the shoe," explains Jon Teipen, who serves as the principal footwear product line manager at Brooks. "This feature won't create a rigid barrier on the inner part of the shoe. As you roll your foot inward more, the GuideRail responds with increased resistance.

This season's Adrenaline features an updated nitrogen-infused EVA-blend midsole foam that is both lighter and significantly softer, yet remains calibrated for more than just cushioning, resulting in a notably lively sensation when worn. The engineered mesh upper ensures a snug and comfy fit, securing the midfoot through a dual-layer reinforced arch section while maintaining breathability and flexibility at the forefront. With a 12-millimeter heel-to-toe offset, average stack heights, pliable forefeet, and evident support beneath the arch—including a straighter build compared to previous models—this iteration of the Adrenaline 24 offers the most conventional stability experience within its lineup.

Despite being different from the rigid and cumbersome versions of the past, I discovered that the Adrenaline offered a smooth and unobtrusive ride, providing gentle rearfoot containment. The cushioning and support were particularly impressive during heel strikes and throughout each step, but they also performed well when accelerating and staying on the forefoot. Thanks to this adaptability and reliable stability, the Adrenaline became an ideal choice for everyday training shoes.

Second Place for Best Firm, Helpful Customer Service

Topo UltraFly 5

$140 at REI (Men’s) $140 at REI (Women’s)

Weight: 9.9 ounces for men, 8.0 ounces for women

Stack Height: 30–25 mm

Drop: 5 mm

Stability Strategy: Midline posterior. Ample forefoot width featuring significant big toe splay. Minimal heel-to-toe offset. Linear design.

The Topo UltraFly 5 shoes blend classic elements such as a medial post with a sleek, minimalistic aesthetic. Their stable feel during use primarily comes from their broad front section (especially around the big toe area), a slight incline of just 5 millimeters, and a medium-thick layer of fairly stiff yet reactive cushioning material. Additionally, there is an extra piece of denser padding beneath the arch designed to minimize sinking and twisting. However, this thicker portion of the sole constitutes merely half the overall midsole thickness near the arch before gradually decreasing towards both the toes and the heel areas. Altogether, these components create a mild sensation of comprehensive support throughout each step taken, allowing for normal foot motion rather than restricting it.

While running, the standout feature was the ample space in the forefoot area; the shoe's design allowed my toes to spread naturally, enabling comfortable use with full CorrectToes. Additionally, the broad foundation provided stability and ensured secure takeoffs without feeling unsteady. This athletic posture was further improved by the lightweight, reactive ZipFoam used in Topo’s sole, which offered sufficient cushioning upon landing yet maintained close-to-the-ground responsiveness. The snug fit around the midfoot complemented the open feel at the front, allowing me to enjoy the comfort confidently, free from worries about slippage.

While perhaps not the most streamlined option out there, this shoe manages to feel light despite offering robust protection and support. Each time I laced up with them, I noticed an increase in my running pace and a heightened sense of my foot movement, which made me more effective throughout the duration of my run. The shoes encouraged engagement from my toes and improved my overall stance. Regardless of whether I began feeling fatigued—especially during those much-needed easy recovery days—I found myself reluctant to finish whenever I put on the UltraFly 5.

Most Invisible Support

Altra Experience Form

$145 at REI (Men’s) $145 at REI (Women’s)

Weight: 9.6 ounces (for men), 7.8 ounces (for women)

Stack Height: 32–28 mm for men; 30–26 mm for women

Drop: 4 mm

Stability Strategy: GuidesRails. Broad toe box. Minimal heel-toe drop. Linear design.

Every Altra shoe ensures stability via a well-balanced, low-drop design paired with an ample toe box that permits your foot to splay comfortably and maintain a natural stance. Thanks to this approach, the company can utilize softer, more responsive materials instead of relying heavily on firm support systems and restrictive control features—a strategy they adopted long before many competitors started experimenting with different geometries.

Their latest addition to the 4mm drop lineup, the Experience Form, incorporates guide rails along both edges of the heel for enhanced stability. An increased edge around the arch area maintains the same firmness level as the remainder of the midsole, resulting in a gentle containment that minimally interferes with foot movement. Beneath this design lies a straightforward foundation where the arch section is notably reinforced compared to previous versions within the series, ensuring comprehensive support across the entire foot. Additionally, an advanced mesh fabric adorns the shoe’s exterior; it offers a sleek appearance yet remains snugly fitted at key points like the back and middle part of the foot, allowing natural toe mobility.

I discovered that the Experience Form shoe offers a plush yet reactive feel, which is firmer compared to numerous contemporary footwear options due to its moderate cushioning with CMEVA material. This design makes the shoe lightweight and agile, promoting rapid interaction with the ground and a seamless transition from heel to toe, characterized by a mild rocking motion and flexible movement akin to barefoot walking. During runs, the stabilizing elements remained inconspicuous, blending seamlessly into my stride. Whether maintaining an easy pace or accelerating, each step felt secure and well-supported. Regardless of how much running I intended to do, these qualities frequently led me to add spontaneous sprints and appreciate the blend of agility, comfortable firmness, and discreet support provided by the shoe.

Best Full-Foot Support

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

$140 at REI (Men’s) $140 at REI (Women’s)

Weight: 10.7 ounces (for men), 8.6 ounces (for women)

Stack Height: 35.5–27.5 mm

Drop: 8 mm

Stability Strategy: Inclined plate featuring a dual-density midsole. Broad, straight foundation.

Every one of the integrated shank plates currently trending in modern running footwear primarily serves to provide stability to the cushioning and bounce created by the use of high volumes of soft, yet springy foam material. Similar to those discovered in racing shoes meant for marathons, these plates generally aim at enhancing performance during long-distance runs. super shoes Focus on improving your forward rolls and push-offs; others mainly help control side-to-side movement, such as Skechers' winglets and H-shaped supports, or the midfoot wings found on the plastic plate of the Saucony Endorphin Speed.

In the revamped version of New Balance’s 860 model, they've replaced their conventional rigid midfoot support with an advanced plate design. A flexible EVA layer similar to what was introduced in the Vongo model sits between dual-density foams—softer material atop firmer—which is positioned such that it's thicker near the inner arch area and thinner towards the outer edge. Consequently, this forms a base where stiffer foam supports the inside part beneath your arch, while softer padding envelops the outside portion for impact absorption.
Moreover, the plate features hexagon-shaped perforations specifically along the lateral section reducing stiffness here yet maintaining solidity medially. These strategic cuts alongside the layered density work together to ensure you experience a gentle touchdown followed by controlled pronation—all without interrupting comfort or causing abrupt shifts during movement.

The 860 v14's plate serves more than just shaping that angular design, according to Paul Zielinski, who holds the position of senior global product manager at New Balance. Laboratory research conducted by them indicated that midsole foams tend to elongate under pressure during instances where the foot overpronates or moves quickly. According to Zielinski, "This plate enables the foam to maintain better form without stretching excessively." When combined with the dual-density midsole materials, this setup aids in stabilizing the shoe's base structure, ensuring consistent guidance from heel strike through push-off.

The additional midsole foam beneath the forefoot, combined with a reduced heel-toe drop, a chamfered heel, and a more pronounced rocking motion, ensures a seamless roll from the middle of the foot to push off at the toes.

Ouch! On my foot, the combination of the plate and dual-density foam offered the most robust full-foot rotational stability among these shoes. Although the midsole felt plush and gave me a lightweight, comfortable experience with each stride, my feet barely rolled inward. This level of control did not cause discomfort for my naturally non-pronating left foot. However, quite soon into running, I noticed some rubbing in the bones of my right knee—which tends to pronate—since they weren’t aligning properly due to lack of movement. Additionally, the tendons around my right ankle became sore post-run because they were working hard against the firm slope of the midsole.

The 860 v14 offers robust midfoot support, making it less adaptable for neutral runners compared to several alternatives featured here. However, it remains an excellent option for individuals aiming to reduce the rate of inward rolling motion during their stride, providing a seamless and pleasant experience from heel strike to push-off.

Best for Racing

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2

$140 at Amazon (Men’s) $140 at Amazon (Women’s)

Weight: 7.6 ounces (for men), 6.9 ounces (for women)

Stack Height: 31.5–23.5 mm

Drop: 8 mm

Stability Strategy: Heel stabilizers. Thin midsole featuring fast-return foam.

The updated second edition of the swift Hyperion GTS features a marginally taller layer of a novel nitrogen-charged EVA-based midsole material, according to Brooks this new composition is both lighter and offers better responsiveness compared to its forerunner. During my test runs, this update proved accurate; the cushioning gave an impression of resilience as it compressed and then sprang back efficiently, resulting in a dynamic feel that motivated me to increase my speed.

Similar to other GTS models within the Brooks lineup, the Hyperion GTS 2 includes stabilizing guide rails alongside the edges of the heel and midfoot—an elevated section of the midsole foam on the medial side—along with a firmer foam segment under the arch area. These design elements aim to minimize excessive inward or outward foot movement during runs, particularly when tired near the end of longer distances. During my experience, these features were barely noticeable unless compared against shoes without such support mechanisms. However, what stood out significantly was how stable and well-connected each step felt due to the low profile of the midsole combined with its relatively broad foundation and firm feel, which facilitated swift movements and steady takeoffs.

The cushioning provided by the foam isn't minimalist at all; instead, it offers a smooth and comfy experience regardless of your running speed. This makes these shoes ideal for everyday training for those who do not favor the common soft, pillowy sole found in many modern designs. However, most runners will find the Hyperion GTS 2 to be lightweight and bouncy. non-plated , an upbeat trainer and racer that doesn't put excessive strain on your feet and provides support when needed in the final miles. An added advantage is the newly designed, breathable mesh upper.

Best for Up-Tempo Days

Saucony Tempus 2

$160 at Running Warehouse (For Men) $160 at Running Warehouse (For Women)

Weight: 8.2 ounces (for women); 9.4 ounces (for men)

Stack Height: 33–25 mm

Drop: 8 mm

Stability Strategy: Frame designed with an over-under approach and strategically placed supportive foams.

The Tempus sits at the acute end of the stability continuum, offering a dynamic riding experience that left me feeling agile, springy, and swift—all while maintaining good foot control and support. The key to this shoe's performance is its midsole, which incorporates lightweight, highly cushioned, and maximally rebounding Pebax foam typically known for instability, encased within a firmer, more stable EVA framework.

Utilizing a sturdier structure to manage softer foam's compression isn’t novel or distinctive. Many shoes featuring such structures encase the lower part of the entire footwear in tougher materials for stability. This approach does provide firm support but leads to harder landings and may quicken the foot’s motion upon striking the ground before rotating internally. Conversely, the Tempus incorporates an innovative top-and-bottom frame design. It positions itself above the flexible Pebax at the heel level, spans across the complete midsole beneath the arch area, extends underneath the Pebax towards the front section, and stretches along the underside periphery all the way up toward the toes.

This frame harnesses its magical properties through the strategic placement of Pebax at the base of the heel. This material's flexibility helps mitigate the instability introduced by the footwear design. Upon contact with the ground, it compresses and changes shape, smoothing out the movement as your foot moves from side to side and progresses forward. Simultaneously, the stiffer structure enveloping the upper part of the heel holds your foot securely in place over the platform. Underneath the arch, an all-encompassing support system minimizes rotational motion and offers necessary reinforcement. In the forefoot area, direct beneath your step, you experience the shock absorption and energy return provided by the Pebax. Additionally, the firm foam underneath contributes extra stability to facilitate smoother push-off motions during walking or running.

The revised engineered mesh upper in version 2 secures the midfoot more effectively, improving the bond between the foot and shoe as well as the footwear's capability to excel at high speeds.

While running, the Tempus stood out as offering one of the most enjoyable and lively rides among all the options tested. It was particularly adept at catering to my varying stability requirements. The flexible Pebax material used in the sole underneath the heel allowed both of my feet to land comfortably in their natural slightly outward rotated state, unlike some other models with rigid flared heels which forced an internal twist. During each stride’s progression from impact through mid-foot roll, this shoe offered subtle yet sufficient support specifically tailored to my more mobile right foot—support so gentle it went nearly unnoticed. However, during these movements, it still permitted necessary pronation around my knees. For my naturally aligned left foot, the experience remained fluid and comfortable; nothing felt overly controlled or cumbersome beneath, thanks solely to the resilient and reactive Pebax cushioning.

The Tempus stands out with a slimmer design through the heel and midfoot region compared to typical stability footwear, utilizing a firm structure instead of extra cushioning for arch support. However, it broadens similar to others towards the forefoot area. Additionally, it maintains a lower profile upfront which ensures adequate ground contact needed for an effective and dynamic toe-off. Its flexibility allows for a seamless rolling motion regardless of speed or step pattern. Throughout various paces, this shoe demonstrated responsiveness and agility; yet, discreet supportive features were consistently available. Over longer distances, the benefits became even clearer, particularly appreciating how well it facilitated controlled foot movement and provided lateral steadiness.

The Tempus can serve as a lively everyday runner or a reliable choice for marathons, particularly for those seeking the responsiveness of Pebax along with added support over extended distances. It makes an outstanding option for serious long-distance training, especially for runners aiming to compete in shoes equipped with carbon plates.

Best for Going Long

Mount to Coast P1

$160 for Mount to Coast (Men’s) $160 for Mount to Coast (Women’s)

Weight: 9.9 ounces (equivalent to men’s size 9, women’s size 10.5)

Stack Height: 37–27 mm

Drop: 10 mm

Stability Strategy: Directing geometry with an integrated midsole insert. Supportive arch wrapping. Central positioning insole.

Mount to Coast is a newly established brand focused on crafting footwear specifically designed for ultramarathon runners. However, based on my personal experience with these shoes, I feel they offer comfort and advantages even if you're not logging miles throughout the entire day.

The P1, Mount to Coast’s stability model, has the same nitrogen-infused, PEBA-based midsole found in their R1 racer , offering a gentle, springy, and adaptable ride that feels more engaged than you'd expect from its 37-millimeter heel height. The reactive foam, calibrated to be stiffer compared to the PEBA used in racing flats, delivers plush cushioning beneath your feet before firming up swiftly for precise feedback from the ground. This seamless experience promotes a nearly barefoot sensation, facilitating natural foot movement and terrain awareness—all while effectively absorbing hard impacts.

The design draws inspiration from minimalism, mirroring the contours of the foot with a close-fitting heel and a secure strap across the mid-foot area before widening into a flare at the front, particularly around the big toe region, offering ample space and a solid foundation for a completely spread-out foot. This steadiness is further bolstered by an S-curved piece of bendable plastic running from the midfoot through to beneath the large toe, delivering extra reinforcement along the typical rotational movement during the push-off phase of walking or running. According to Mount to Coast’s studies, curbing unnecessary motion in the forefoot is crucial compared to addressing rearfoot rotation which conventional stabilizing footwear tends to focus on; they assert that this innovation enhances overall foot positioning while stimulating muscle engagement in the arches.

Using the P1 model, the footwear provided an effortless, natural roll from heel to toe, along with a slight additional stiffness beneath the forefoot that contributed to a secure footing and powerful takeoff. However, what stood out more prominently was the dual-zone insole designed to center and support my heel, combined with an arch wrap incorporated into the upper part of the shoe that connected seamlessly with the laces. This setup gave me the sensation of having my foot meticulously taped for sports activities—a snug fit that offered consistent support as well as adaptability throughout each step’s motion.

The adaptable P1 remained unobtrusive when I increased my speed, yet it didn't seem to diminish the exertion level like certain rocker-shaped designs tend to do. On longer runs, though, it enabled me to swiftly settle into an easy, effective cadence that effortlessly covered distance with such comfort that I often stretched my running sessions for as long as possible within the timeframe available.

Best for Recovery Days

Hoka Gaviota 5

$175 at REI (Men’s) $175 at REI (Women’s)

Weight: 9.1 ounces (for women); 10.9 ounces (for men)

Stack Height: 34-28 mm (for women); 36-30 mm (for men)

Drop: 6 mm

Stability Strategy: Soft foam H-Frame. Broad and linear design. Side panels.

Even with their elevated stack heights, Hoka’s footwear has consistently offered built-in stability thanks to their broad base, minimal heel-to-toe offset, and a secure, bootlike structure enveloping the rearfoot when seated atop the midsole. Over the years, their stable designs have incorporated a "J-frame" element for enhanced rotational support. This component consists of denser foam extending along the entire medial side of the midsole and curving round to reinforce the outer underside edge.

The updated Gaviota 5 keeps its broad design and elevated side walls but replaces the J-frame with an H-frame. A thinner, lower-density foam sits atop the midsole and encircles the shoe’s edge with a connecting strip running through the center, resembling an '8'. When your foot presses down into this section, it settles further within the footprint made by the sidewalls of the firmer yet still padded base layer underneath. According to Hoka, the H-frame enables them to incorporate softer materials than previously used, providing built-in support along with enhanced padding, particularly near the sole of the foot.

While on the move, the structure seemed almost imperceptible, detectable mainly through an impression of balance as I settled into the soft cushioning sole. Nonetheless, along with the generous width and snug fit provided by the pliable yet non-elastic creel Jacquard material above, this proved sufficient to prevent the thickly padded footwear from seeming unsteady. Though it makes no claims about limiting internal twisting, the overall foot stabilization ensured that both my feet and knees felt securely supported regardless of the distance covered during running.

Leading Image: 101 Degrees West